William, C. C. & Levin, S. A. Toward a science of sustainability. Toward Sci. Sustain. 33, 172–172 (2009).
Ostrom, E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15181–15187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104 (2007).
Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133 (2009).
Rankin, D. J., Bargum, K. & Kokko, H. The tragedy of the commons in evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TREE.2007.07.009 (2007).
Ostrom, E. Understanding institutional diversity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2009).
Bodin, Ö. Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114 (2017).
Nagendra, H. & Ostrom, E. Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06582-190267 (2014).
Leslie, H. M. et al. Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 5979–5984. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414640112 (2015).
Cumming, G. S. et al. Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: a post-Ostrom research agenda. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 44, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005 (2020).
Perrotti, D., Hyde, K. & OteroPeña, D. Can water systems foster commoning practices? analysing leverages for self-organization in urban water commons as social–ecological systems. Sustain. Sci. 15, 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00782-1 (2020).
Radywyl, N. & Bigg, C. Reclaiming the commons for urban transformation. J. Clean. Prod. 50, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.020 (2013).
Colding, J. & Barthel, S. The potential of “Urban Green Commons” in the resilience building of cities. Ecol. Econ. 86, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016 (2013).
Aronson, M. F. J. et al. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1480 (2017).
Fox-Kämper, R. et al. Urban community gardens: an evaluation of governance approaches and related enablers and barriers at different development stages. Landsc. Urban Plan. 170, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.023 (2018).
McGinnis, M. D. & Ostrom, E. Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230 (2014).
Taylor, J. R. & Lovell, S. T. Urban home food gardens in the Global North: Research traditions and future directions. Agric. Hum. Values 31, 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9475-1 (2014).
Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G. & Pahl-Wostl, C. Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05551-180426 (2013).
Partelow, S. A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10594-230436 (2018).
Herrero-Jáuregui, C. et al. What do we talk about when we talk about social-ecological systems? A literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland) https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082950 (2018).
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S. & Gardner, A. Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Curr. Biol. 17, 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.004 (2007).
Levin, S. A. Public goods in relation to competition, cooperation, and spite. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 10838–10845. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400830111 (2014).
Queller, D. C. Expanded social fitness and Hamilton’s rule for kin, kith, and kind. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 10792–10799. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100298108 (2011).
Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W. D. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211, 1390–1396 (1981).
Ostrom, E., Ahn, T. K. & Kingdom, U. A Social Science Perspective on Social Capital. Sociol. J. Br. Sociol. Assoc., 812–855 (2001).
Sobel, J. Can we trust social capital?. J. Econ. Lit. 40, 139–154 (2002).
Tornaghi, C. Critical geography of urban agriculture. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38, 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513512542 (2014).
Chalmin-Pui, L. S., Griffiths, A., Roe, J., Heaton, T. & Cameron, R. Why garden?—attitudes and the perceived health benefits of home gardening. Cities 112, 103118–103118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103118 (2021).
Feinberg, A., Ghorbani, A. & Herder, P. Diversity and challenges of the urban commons: a comprehensive review. Int. J. Commons 15, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1033 (2021).
Winkler, B., Maier, A. & Lewandowski, I. Urban gardening in Germany: Cultivating a sustainable lifestyle for the societal transition to a bioeconomy. Sustain. (Switzerland) https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030801 (2019).
Guitart, D., Pickering, C. & Byrne, J. Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban For. Urban Green 11, 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007 (2012).
Andersson, E. et al. Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio 43, 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y (2014).
Philpott, S. M. et al. Gardener demographics, experience, and motivations drive differences in plant species richness and composition in urban gardens. Ecol. Soc. 25, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11666-250408 (2020).
Dunnett, N. & Qasim, M. Perceived benefits to human well-being of urban gardens. HortTechnology 10, 40–45 (2000).
Basurto, X., Gelcich, S. & Ostrom, E. The social–ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1366–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2013.08.001 (2013).
Villamayor-Tomas, S. et al. Using case study data to understand SES interactions: a model-centered meta-analysis of SES framework applications. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 44, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.05.002 (2020).
Persha, L., Agrawal, A. & Chhatre, A. Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science 331, 1606–1608 (2011).
Egerer, M. H., Lin, B. B., Threlfall, C. G. & Kendal, D. Temperature variability influences urban garden plant richness and gardener water use behavior, but not planting decisions. Sci. Total Environ. 646, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.270 (2019).
van Heezik, Y., Freeman, C., Porter, S. & Dickinson, K. J. M. Garden size, householder knowledge, and socio-economic status influence plant and bird diversity at the scale of individual gardens. Ecosystems 16, 1442–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9694-8 (2013).
Tantarimäki, S. Urbaani maatalous maankäytön ja yhteiskunnallisen tilanteen muutoksessa. Tapaustutkimuksena Turun ja Seinäjoen taajamat. Turun yliopisto. Turku (2003).
Chhatre, A. & Agrawal, A. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 17667–17670 (2009).
Agrawal, A. & Chhatre, A. Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Dev. 34, 149–166 (2006).
Cinner, J. E. et al. Bright spots among the world’s coral reefs. Nature 535, 416–419 (2016).
Feinberg, A., Rogge, N., Hooijschuur, E., Ghorbani, A. & Herder, P. Sustaining collective action in urban community gardens. Jasss https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4506 (2021).
Cinner, J. E. et al. Comanagement of coral reef social-ecological systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 5219–5222. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121215109 (2012).
Kline, R. B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (Guilford publications, 2015).
Asah, S. T. Empirical social-ecological system analysis: From theoretical framework to latent variable structural equation model. Environ. Manag. 42, 1077–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9172-9 (2008).
Allen, M. C., Lockwood, J. L. & Burger, J. Finding clarity in ecological outcomes using empirical integrated social–ecological systems: a case study of agriculture-dependent grassland birds. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13776 (2021).
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 6, 1–55 (1999).
Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. Mplus user’s guide (Version 7). Los Angeles, CA: Author (1998).
Gignac, G. E. Self-reported emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: Testing incremental predictive validity hypotheses via structural equation modeling (SEM) in a small sample. Personal. Individ. Differ. 40, 1569–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.001 (2006).
Agrawal, A. & Chhatre, A. Against mono-consequentialism: Multiple outcomes and their drivers in social-ecological systems. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.007 (2011).
CoDyre, M., Fraser, E. D. G. & Landman, K. How does your garden grow? an empirical evaluation of the costs and potential of urban gardening. Urban For. Urban Green. 14, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.001 (2015).
Pretty, J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302, 1912–1914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847 (2003).
Baruch, Y. Response rate in academic studies-a comparative analysis. Hum. Relat. 52, 421–438 (1999).
Fan, W. & Yan, Z. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 132–139 (2010).
Burton-Chellew, M. N., Ross-Gillespie, A. & West, S. A. Cooperation in humans: competition between groups and proximate emotions. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31, 104–108 (2010).
Andersson, K. P. Who talks with whom? the role of repeated interactions in decentralized forest governance. World Dev. 32, 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.07.007 (2004).
(OSF), O. S. o. F. (Helsinki: Natural Resources Institute Finland, www.stat.fi/til/satot/index_en.html, 2019).
Grewal, R., Cote, J. A. & Baumgartner, H. Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: implications for theory testing. Mark. Sci. 23, 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0070 (2004).
Kyriazos, T. A. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology 09, 2207–2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126 (2018).
Gerbing, D. W. & Anderson, J. C. the effects of sampling error and model characteristics on parameter estimation for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Multivar. Behav. Res. 20, 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2003_2 (1985).
Teh, P. L. & Sun, H. Knowledge sharing, job attitudes and organisational citizenship behaviour. Ind Manag. Data Syst. 112(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211193644 (2012).
von Hippel, P. T. How many imputations do you need? a two-stage calculation using a quadratic rule. Sociol. Methods Res. 49, 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747303 (2020).
Wayman, J. C. in Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. 16.
Olinsky, A., Chen, S. & Harlow, L. The comparative efficacy of imputation methods for missing data in structural equation modeling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 151, 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00578-7 (2003).
Tang, S. Y. Institutional arrangements and the management of common-pool resources. Public Adm. Rev. 51(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/976635 (1991).
More Stories
Three Keys of Branding That Will Turn Small Business Advertising Expense into an Investment
Perbedaan Logo Design Dengan Branding
Travel Agents Can Help With Vacations and Business Travel